0.00/0.00 % Leo-III: Strategy 1 (for '60') 4.79/5.98 % [INFO] Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 4.79/5.98 % [INFO] Parsing done (115ms). 4.79/5.98 % [INFO] Running in sequential loop mode. 4.79/5.98 % [CONFIG] Using configuration: timeout(60) with strategy 4.79/5.98 % [INFO] eprover registered as external prover. 4.79/5.98 % [INFO] cvc4 registered as external prover. 4.79/5.98 % [INFO] Parsing finished. Scanning for conjecture ... 4.79/5.98 % [INFO] Found a conjecture and 8 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 4.79/5.98 % [INFO] Axiom selection finished. Selected 8 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 4.79/5.98 % [INFO] Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 4.79/5.98 % [INFO] Type checking passed. Searching for refutation ... 4.79/5.98 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ... 4.79/5.98 % Time passed: 1609ms (effective reasoning time: 1138ms) 4.79/5.98 % Solved by strategy 4.79/5.98 % Axioms used in derivation (4): ax_007, ax, ax_004, ax_002 4.79/5.98 % No. of inferences in proof: 36 4.79/5.98 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1609 ms resp. 1138 ms w/o parsing 4.79/5.98 % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 4.79/5.98 thf(num_type, type, num: $tType). 4.79/5.98 thf(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI_type, type, holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI: ($i > ($o > $o))). 4.79/5.98 thf(lAnna_THFTYPE_i_type, type, lAnna_THFTYPE_i: $i). 4.79/5.98 thf(lBill_THFTYPE_i_type, type, lBill_THFTYPE_i: $i). 4.79/5.98 thf(lMary_THFTYPE_i_type, type, lMary_THFTYPE_i: $i). 4.79/5.98 thf(lSue_THFTYPE_i_type, type, lSue_THFTYPE_i: $i). 4.79/5.98 thf(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI_type, type, lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: ($i > $i)). 4.79/5.98 thf(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI_type, type, likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: ($i > ($i > $o))). 4.79/5.98 thf(n2009_THFTYPE_i_type, type, n2009_THFTYPE_i: $i). 4.79/5.98 thf(parent_THFTYPE_IiioI_type, type, parent_THFTYPE_IiioI: ($i > ($i > $o))). 4.79/5.98 thf(3,axiom,((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lMary_THFTYPE_i)))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_007)). 4.79/5.98 thf(13,plain,((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lMary_THFTYPE_i)))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3])). 4.79/5.98 thf(5,axiom,((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax)). 4.79/5.98 thf(15,plain,((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5])). 4.79/5.98 thf(1,conjecture,((? [A:($i > ($i > $o))]: (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ((A @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) & ~ (! [B:$i,C:$i]: (A @ B @ C)) & (A @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con)). 4.79/5.98 thf(2,negated_conjecture,((~ (? [A:($i > ($i > $o))]: (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ((A @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) & ~ (! [B:$i,C:$i]: (A @ B @ C)) & (A @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)))))),inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1])). 4.79/5.98 thf(11,plain,((~ (? [A:($i > ($i > $o))]: (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ((A @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) & ~ (! [B:$i,C:$i]: (A @ B @ C)) & (A @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)))))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2])). 4.79/5.98 thf(12,plain,(! [A:($i > ($i > $o))] : ((~ (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ((A @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) & ~ (! [B:$i,C:$i]: (A @ B @ C)) & (A @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)))))),inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[11])). 4.79/5.98 thf(31,plain,(! [A:($i > ($i > $o))] : ((~ (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~ (! [B:$i,C:$i]: (A @ B @ C)) & (A @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)))) | ((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)) != (A @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)))),inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[15,12])). 4.79/5.98 thf(35,plain,((~ (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~ (! [A:$i,B:$i]: (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))) & (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)))))),inference(pre_uni,[status(thm)],[31:[bind(A, $thf(^ [B:$i,C:$i]: (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))))]])). 4.79/5.98 thf(57,plain,((~ (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false))),inference(simp,[status(thm)],[35])). 4.79/5.98 thf(124,plain,(((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lMary_THFTYPE_i))) != (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false))),inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[13,57])). 4.79/5.98 thf(131,plain,(((lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) != (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i)) | (~ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lMary_THFTYPE_i))),inference(simp,[status(thm)],[124])). 4.79/5.98 thf(138,plain,((~ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lMary_THFTYPE_i)) | ((lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) != (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i))),inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[131])). 4.79/5.98 thf(139,plain,((~ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lMary_THFTYPE_i))),inference(simp,[status(thm)],[138])). 4.79/5.98 thf(7,axiom,((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_004)). 4.79/5.98 thf(17,plain,((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7])). 4.79/5.98 thf(76,plain,(((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)) != (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false))),inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[17,57])). 4.79/5.98 thf(80,plain,(((lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) != (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i)) | (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)),inference(simp,[status(thm)],[76])). 4.79/5.98 thf(83,plain,((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)),inference(simp,[status(thm)],[80])). 4.79/5.98 thf(87,plain,((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true)),inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[17,83])). 4.79/5.98 thf(89,plain,(! [A:($i > ($i > $o))] : ((~ (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ((A @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) & ~ (! [B:$i,C:$i]: (A @ B @ C))))) | ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) != (A @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)))),inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[83,12])). 4.79/5.98 thf(95,plain,((~ (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) & ~ (! [A:$i,B:$i]: (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ A @ B)))))),inference(pre_uni,[status(thm)],[89:[bind(A, $thf(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI))]])). 4.79/5.98 thf(4,axiom,((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_002)). 4.79/5.98 thf(14,plain,((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4])). 4.79/5.98 thf(75,plain,(((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)) != (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false))),inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[14,57])). 4.79/5.98 thf(79,plain,(((lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) != (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i)) | (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)),inference(simp,[status(thm)],[75])). 4.79/5.98 thf(86,plain,((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)),inference(simp,[status(thm)],[79])). 4.79/5.98 thf(217,plain,((~ (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (($true) & ~ (! [A:$i,B:$i]: (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ A @ B)))))),inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[95,86])). 4.79/5.98 thf(218,plain,((~ (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~ (! [A:$i,B:$i]: (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ A @ B)))))),inference(simp,[status(thm)],[217])). 4.79/5.98 thf(219,plain,(((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~ (! [A:$i,B:$i]: (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ A @ B)))) != (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true))),inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[87,218])). 4.79/5.98 thf(220,plain,(((lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) != (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i)) | (~ (~ (! [A:$i,B:$i]: (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ A @ B))))),inference(simp,[status(thm)],[219])). 4.79/5.98 thf(221,plain,(! [B:$i,A:$i] : ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ A @ B) | ((lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) != (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i)))),inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[220])). 4.79/5.98 thf(222,plain,(! [B:$i,A:$i] : ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ A @ B))),inference(simp,[status(thm)],[221])). 4.79/5.98 thf(224,plain,(~ ($true)),inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[139,222])). 4.79/5.98 thf(225,plain,($false),inference(simp,[status(thm)],[224])). 4.79/5.98 % SZS output end Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 4.79/5.98 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ... 4.79/5.98 FINAL WATCH: 4.6 CPU 1.8 WC 4.79/5.98 Killed 1 orphans 4.79/5.98 Killed 2 orphans 4.79/5.98 Killed 1 orphans 4.79/5.98 EOF